Comparison of cardiovascular co-morbidities and CPAP use in patients with positional and non-positional mild obstructive sleep apnea
نویسندگان
چکیده
BACKGROUND This retrospective cohort study aimed to determine if there are differences in cardiovascular co-morbidities, blood pressure (BP) and continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) use between patients with positional-dependent and nonpositional-dependent obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). METHODS Patients who were referred for overnight polysomnography for suspected OSA between 2007 and 2011 were screened. A total of 371 patients with OSA were included for analysis and divided into six groups according to positional-dependency and severity of OSA: positional mild (n = 52), positional moderate (n = 29), positional severe (n = 24), non-positional mild (n = 18), non-positional moderate (n = 70) and non-positional severe group (n = 178). The six groups were compared for anthropometric and polysomnographic variables, presence of cardiovascular co-morbidities, morning and evening BP and the changes between evening and morning BP, and CPAP device usage patterns. RESULTS Demographic and anthropometric variables showed non-positional severe OSA had poor sleep quality and higher morning blood pressures. Positional mild OSA had the lowest cardiovascular co-morbidities. Overall CPAP acceptance was 45.6%. Mild OSA patients had the lowest CPAP acceptance rate (10%), followed by moderate group (37.37%) and severe group (61.88%, P < 0.001). However, the significant difference in CPAP acceptance across OSA severity disappeared when the data was stratified by positional dependency. CONCLUSIONS This study found that positional mild OSA had less cardiovascular co-morbidities compared with subjects with positional severe OSA. Independent of posture, CPAP acceptance in patients with mild OSA was low, but CPAP compliance was similar in CPAP acceptors regardless of posture dependency of OSA. Since there are increasing evidences of greater cardiovascular risk for untreated mild OSA, improving CPAP acceptance among mild OSA patients may be clinically important regardless of posture dependency.
منابع مشابه
Title:comparison of Cardiovascular Co-morbidities and Cpap Use in Patients with Positional and Non-positional Mild Obstructive Sleep Apnea
متن کامل
Comparison of cardiovascular co-morbidities and CPAP use in patients with positional and non-positional mild obstructive sleep apnea Running Title: Positional mild OSA and blood pressure
1 Division of Pulmonary Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Taipei Tzuchi Hospital, the Buddhist Tzuchi Medical Foundation. 2 Divisions of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Keelung, Keelung City, Taiwan. The School of Medicine, Tzu-Chi University, Hualien, Taiwan. Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Taipei Tzuchi Hospital, t...
متن کاملComparison of cardiovascular co - morbidities and CPAP use in patients with positional 1 and non - positional mild obstructive sleep apnea 2 3 Running
9 1 Division of Pulmonary Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Taipei Tzuchi Hospital, 10 the Buddhist Tzuchi Medical Foundation. 11 2 Divisions of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital 12 at Keelung, Keelung City, Taiwan. 13 The School of Medicine, Tzu-Chi University, Hualien, Taiwan. 14 Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, Taipei T...
متن کاملFactors Affecting Patients’ Adherence to Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Therapy for Obstructive Sleep Apnea Disorder: A Multi-Method Approach
Background: Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is the gold standard therapy for treating obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) disorder. However, patients’ adherence to its regular use is poor. The present study aimed to determine the adherence rate to CPAP therapy by identifying factors affecting its regular use and its associated problems and discomforts among a sample population in Mashhad (...
متن کاملPositional treatment vs continuous positive airway pressure in patients with positional obstructive sleep apnea syndrome.
OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to compare the relative efficacy of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) and positional treatment in the management of positional obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), using objective outcome measures. DESIGN A prospective, randomized, single blind crossover comparison of CPAP and positional treatment for 2 weeks each. SETTING A university teaching hospit...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره 14 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2014